高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Versus Bone Cement Screw for Fixation in Porcine Spinal Low Bone Mass Model

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Orthopedics,Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University [2]Department of Imaging,Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. [3]Department of Orthopaedics, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou, Hainan,P.R.China. [4]Shanghai Clinical College,Anhui Medical University, Shanghai.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
A prospective study of in vitro animal.To compare the biomechanics of cortical bone trajectory screw (CBT) and bone cement screw (BC) in an isolated porcine spinal low bone mass model.The choice of spinal fixation in patients with osteoporosis remains controversial. Is CBT better than BC? Research on this issue is lacking.Ten porcine spines with 3 segments were treated with EDTA decalcification. After 8 weeks, all the models met the criteria of low bone mass. Ten specimens were randomly divided into groups, group was implanted with CBT screw (CBT group) and the other group was implanted with bone cement screw (BC group). The biomechanical material testing machine was used to compare the porcine spine activities of the two groups in flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotation, and then insertional torque, pull-out force, and anti-compression force of the 2 groups were compared. Independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups.Ten 3 segments of porcine spine models with low bone mass were established, and the bone mineral density of all models was lower than 0.75 g/cm2. There is no difference between the CBT and BC groups in flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotation angle, P>0.05. However, there were significant differences between the 2 groups and the control group, with P<0.01. The 2 groups significantly differed between the insertional torque (P=0.03) and the screw pull-out force (P=0.021). The anti-compression forces between the 2 groups have no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.946).The insertional torque and pull-out force of the CBT were higher than those of the BC in the isolated low bone porcine spine model. The range of motion and anti-compression ability of the model was similar between the 2 fixation methods.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学 4 区 骨科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学 4 区 骨科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q3 ORTHOPEDICS

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Orthopedics,Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Orthopedics,Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University [*1]Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:25498 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1499 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)