Gilteritinib Versus Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial in Asia
机构:[1]Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Inst Hematol & Blood Dis Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Blood Dis, State Key Lab Expt Hematol, Tianjin, Peoples R China[2]Peking Univ Int Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China[3]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China[4]Shanghai Tongren Hosp, Dept Hematol, Shanghai, Peoples R China[5]Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Hematol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China广东省人民医院[6]Peking Univ Peoples Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China[7]Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Fujian Inst Hematol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China[8]Astellas Pharma Inc, Beijing, Peoples R China[9]Astellas Pharma Inc, Tokyo, Japan[10]Almazov Natl Med Res Ctr, St Petersburg, Russia[11]Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Dept Hematol,Ampang Hosp Selangor, Sarawak, Malaysia[12]State Med Univ, Clin Res Inst Pediat Hematol & Transplantat Name, St Petersburg, Russia[13]Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Hematol, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia[14]Mahidol Univ, Fac Med Siriraj Hosp, Div Hematol, Dept Med, Bangkok, Thailand[15]Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol, Moscow, Russia[16]Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, IL USA
Background: Due to poor prognosis, treatment options for patients with FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) acute myeloid leukemia
(AML) who are refractory to therapy or have relapsed (R/R) are needed globally. Gilteritinib is approved in multiple countries,
including Japan, and has recently received conditional approval in China for the treatment of R/R FLT3mut+ AML; in the phase 3
ADMIRAL trial, superior survival benet and a favorable safety prole were shown for patients receiving gilteritinib compared
to those receiving salvage chemotherapy (SC) (HR 0.64 [95% CI: 0.49, 0.83]; P<0.001) in the R/R FLT3mut+ AML setting. While
data from the Asian subpopulation of ADMIRAL have been evaluated, larger randomized, controlled trials of outcomes for
treatments in a predominantly Asian population are lacking.
Aim/Objective: To evaluate the efcacy and safety/tolerability of gilteritinib compared with SC in Asian patients with R/R
FLT3mut+ AML after rst-line therapy.
Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, multicenter COMMODORE (NCT03182244) trial, adult patients in China, Russia, Singapore,
Thailand, andMalaysia with R/R FLT3mut+ AML were randomized 1:1 to gilteritinib 120 mg orally per day or SC (low-dose
cytarabine; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine; or udarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor) over continuous 28-day cycles. Patients must have had an ECOG performance status score
2; those with acute promyelocytic leukemia, BCR-ABL-positive leukemia, clinically active central nervous system disease,
or secondary AML were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and key secondary efcacy endpoints
were event-free survival (EFS) and complete remission (CR). Additional secondary endpoints included duration of remission,
composite CR (CRc), and safety/tolerability. OS and EFS were analyzed with stratied Cox proportional hazard models, and
response rates were analyzed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results of the interim analysis are presented here.
Results: As of June 30, 2020, a total of 234 patients were randomized (gilteritinib, n=116; SC, n=118). Median age was 51.5
and 49.5 years in the gilteritinib and SC groups, respectively; most patients had not previously received FLT3 inhibitors (87.9%
and 93.2%, respectively). Baseline FLT3 mutations in the gilteritinib vs SC groups were: FLT3-ITD (91.4% vs 83.1%), FLT3-TKD
(6.0% vs 11.9%), and both FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD (2.6% vs 5.1%). Median follow-up duration for OS was 11.1 months for
gilteritinib and 6.9 months for SC. Median OS was signicantly longer in the gilteritinib group (9.0 months) compared with
the SC group (4.7 months; HR 0.549 [95% CI: 0.379, 0.795]; P=0.00126; Figure); 1-year survival rates were 33.3% and 23.2%,
respectively. Patients on gilteritinib had signicantly longer EFS than those receiving SC (median EFS 2.8 vs 0.6 months; HR
0.551 [95% CI: 0.395, 0.769]; P=0.00004). A higher proportion of patients achieved CR on gilteritinib (16.4%) compared with SC
(10.2%; P=0.17690); CRc rates were 50.0% and 20.3% (P<0.00001). Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) in the gilteritinib (97.3%) vs
SC (94.2%) groups were comparable; rates for serious AEs were higher for gilteritinib (73.5%) vs SC (61.5%).When adjusted for
treatment exposure, AE rates were lower with gilteritinib (grade 3, 55.56 events/patient-year [E/PY]; serious, 6.19 E/PY) than
with SC (grade 3, 164.00 E/PY; serious, 12.40 E/PY). The most common AEs occurring in the gilteritinib group were anemia
(76.1%), thrombocytopenia (46.9%), pyrexia (41.6%), and increased blood lactate dehydrogenase (41.6%); for SC, the most
common AEs were anemia (64.4%), decreased white blood cell count (41.3%), and thrombocytopenia (38.5%). AEs leading to
death occurred in 22 (19.5%) and 15 (14.4%) of patients receiving gilteritinib or SC, respectively.
Conclusions: Gilteritinib signicantly prolonged OS and EFS compared with SC in patients with R/R FLT3mut+ AML in Asia.
When adjusted for treatment exposure, safety/tolerability was favorable for gilteritinib compared with SC. The results of the
COMMODORE trial further validate and afrm the clinical efcacy and safety data from the ADMIRAL trial, reinforcing the
signicant benet of gilteritinib in R/R FLT3mut+ AML.
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类|1 区医学
小类|1 区血液学
最新[2023]版:
大类|1 区医学
小类|1 区血液学
第一作者:
第一作者机构:[1]Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Inst Hematol & Blood Dis Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Blood Dis, State Key Lab Expt Hematol, Tianjin, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Wang Jianxiang,Jiang Bin,Li Jian,et al.Gilteritinib Versus Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial in Asia[J].BLOOD.2021,138:doi:10.1182/blood-2021-145436.
APA:
Wang, Jianxiang,Jiang, Bin,Li, Jian,Liu, Ligen,Du, Xin...&Tiu, Ramon V..(2021).Gilteritinib Versus Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial in Asia.BLOOD,138,
MLA:
Wang, Jianxiang,et al."Gilteritinib Versus Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial in Asia".BLOOD 138.(2021)