机构:[1]Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, State Key Lab Expt Hematol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Blood Dis, Inst Hematol & Blood Dis Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China[2]Peking Univ, Dept Hematol, Int Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[3]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China[4]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Tongren Hosp, Dept Hematol, Shanghai, Peoples R China[5]Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Hematol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China广东省人民医院[6]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China[7]Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Fujian Inst Hematol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China[8]Astellas China Investment Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China[9]Astellas Pharma Inc, Tokyo, Japan[10]Almazov Natl Med Res Ctr, St Petersburg, Russia[11]Ampang Hosp, Dept Hematol, Selangor, Malaysia[12]State Med Univ, Clin Res Inst Pediat Hematol & Transplantat, St Petersburg, Russia[13]Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Hematol, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia[14]Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Div Hematol, Dept Med,Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand[15]Krasnoyarsk Reg Clin Hosp, Krasnoyarsk, Russia[16]Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, IL USA
The phase 3 COMMODORE trial evaluated gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy (SC) in a predominantly Asian relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3(mut+)) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient population. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS) and complete remission (CR) rate. As of June 30, 2020 (interim analysis: 32.2 months after study initiation), 234 patients were randomized (gilteritinib, n = 116; SC, n = 118). Median OS was significantly longer with gilteritinib versus SC (9.6 vs. 5.0 months; HR 0.566 [95% CI: 0.392, 0.818]; p = 0.00211) with a median follow-up of 10.3 months. Median EFS was also significantly longer with gilteritinib (2.8 vs. 0.6 months; HR 0.551 [95% CI: 0.395, 0.769]; p = 0.00004). CR rates with gilteritinib and SC were 16.4% and 10.2%, respectively; composite CR rates were 50.0% and 20.3%, respectively. Exposure-adjusted grade >= 3 adverse event (AE) rates were lower with gilteritinib (58.38 events/patient-year [E/PY]) versus SC (168.30 E/PY). Common AEs with gilteritinib were anemia (77.9%) and thrombocytopenia (45.1%). Gilteritinib plasma concentration peaked similar to 4 h postdose; similar to 3-fold accumulation occurred with multiple dosing. The COMMODORE trial demonstrated that gilteritinib significantly improved OS and EFS in predominantly Asian patients, validating the outcomes of gilteritinib from the ADMIRAL trial in R/R FLT3(mut+) AML.
第一作者机构:[1]Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, State Key Lab Expt Hematol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Blood Dis, Inst Hematol & Blood Dis Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Wang Jianxiang,Jiang Bin,Li Jian,et al.Phase 3 study of gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia[J].LEUKEMIA.2024,38(11):2410-2418.doi:10.1038/s41375-024-02382-9.
APA:
Wang, Jianxiang,Jiang, Bin,Li, Jian,Liu, Ligen,Du, Xin...&Hasabou, Nahla.(2024).Phase 3 study of gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.LEUKEMIA,38,(11)
MLA:
Wang, Jianxiang,et al."Phase 3 study of gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia".LEUKEMIA 38..11(2024):2410-2418