P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-directed resuscitation does not improve prognosis compared with SvO2 in severe sepsis and septic shock: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical study
机构:[1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China[2]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Pinggu Hospital, Beijing 101200, China[3]Department of Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital of Beijing Daxing District, Beijing 102628, China[4]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China临床科室重症医学科-中心ICU首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[5]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China首都医科大学宣武医院[6]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100009, China首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[7]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China[8]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing 100036, China[9]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Affiliated First Hospital, Beijing 100000, China[10]Department of Critical Care Medicine, PLA Navy General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China[11]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China[12]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221009, China[13]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hebei Province Medical University Affiliated Fourth Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050000, China[14]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Qinghai Province People's Hospital, Xining 810007, China
Purposes: The present study examined the value of P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 compared with ScvO2 as a target for clinical resuscitation of severe sepsis/septic shock. Materials and methods: 228 patients were randomly divided into a P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-targeted and a ScvO2-targeted therapy group. The effects on hemodynamics, interventional intensity, and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Results: The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-targeted therapy group was significantly higher at 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 3 days (P < .05). The P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 of the ScvO2-targeted therapy group was significantly higher at each time point after resuscitation (P< .05). However, the CVP, lactate, urine output, ScvO2, and P(v-a)CO2 were not significantly improved. The P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-targeted therapy group used a smaller fluid volume and required fewer red blood cell transfusions and vasoactive drugs, but these results were also not significant. There were no differences between 28-day and 60-day mortality, APACHE and SOFA scores, ICU length of stay, residence length of stay, number of days free of vasoactive drugs, or number of ventilator-free days. Post hoc tests revealed no significant differences between these two groups in 28-day survival. Conclusion: P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-directed resuscitation did not improve prognosis compared with ScvO2 in severe sepsis and septic shock. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China[*1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Su Longxiang,Tang Bo,Liu Yaling,et al.P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-directed resuscitation does not improve prognosis compared with SvO2 in severe sepsis and septic shock: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical study[J].JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE.2018,48:314-320.doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.009.
APA:
Su, Longxiang,Tang, Bo,Liu, Yaling,Zhou, Guanhua,Guo, Qinghua...&Long, Yun.(2018).P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-directed resuscitation does not improve prognosis compared with SvO2 in severe sepsis and septic shock: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical study.JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE,48,
MLA:
Su, Longxiang,et al."P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-directed resuscitation does not improve prognosis compared with SvO2 in severe sepsis and septic shock: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical study".JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE 48.(2018):314-320