机构:[1]Department of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China临床科室急诊科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[2]Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China[3]Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100191, China[4]Department of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[5]Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院
Background:Acute abdominal pain is a common symptom of emergency patients.The severity was always evaluated based on physicians' clinical experience.The aim of this study was to establish an early risk stratification method (ERSM) for addressing adults with acute abdominal pain,which would guide physicians to take appropriate and timely measures following the established health-care policies.Methods:In Cohort 1,the records of 490 patients with acute abdominal pain that developed within the past 72 h were enrolled in this study.Measurement data and numeration data were compared with analysis of variance and Chi-square test,respectively.Multiple regression analysis calculated odd ratio (OR) value.P and OR values showed the impacts of factors.ERSM was established by clinical experts and statistical experts according to Youden index.In Cohort 2,data from 305 patients with acute abdominal pain were enrolled to validate the accuracy of the ERSM.Then,ERSM was prospectively used in clinical practice.Results:The ERSM was established based on the scores of the patient's clinical characteristics:right lower abdominal pain + 3 × diffuse abdominal pain + 3 × cutting abdominal pain + 3 × pain frequency + 3 × pain duration + fever + 2 × vomiting + 5 × stop defecation + 3 × history of abdominal surgery + hypertension history + diabetes history + hyperlipidemia history + pulse + 2 × skin yellowing + 2 × sclera yellowing + 2 × double lung rale + 10 × unconsciousness + 2 × right lower abdominal tendemess+ 5 × diffuse abdominal tendemess+ 4 × peritoneal irritation + 4 × bowel sounds abnormal + l 0 × suspicious diagnosis + white blood cell count + hematocrit + glucose + 2 × blood urea nitrogen + 3 × creatine + 4 × serum albumin + alanine aminotransferase + total bilirubin + 3 × conjugated bilirubin + amylase.When the score was <18,the patient did not need hospitalization.A score of≥l 8 and <38 indicated that the patient should be under observation or hospitalized.A score of≥3 8 and <50 indicated the need for an emergent operation.A score of≥50 indicated the need for admission to the Intensive Care Unit.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ERSM in Cohorts 1 and 2 were 0.979 and 0.988,respectively.Conclusions:This ERSM was an accurate and reliable method for making an early determination of the severity of acute abdominal pain.There was the strong correlation between scores of ERSM and health-care decision-making.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[5]Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China[*1]Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100050, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Yu Wang,Hong Zhao,Zhen Zhou,et al.Establishment and Application of Early Risk Stratification Method for Acute Abdominal Pain in Adults[J].CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL.2017,130(5):530-535.doi:10.4103/0366-6999.200553.
APA:
Yu Wang,Hong Zhao,Zhen Zhou,Ci Tian,HongLi Xiao&BaoEn Wang.(2017).Establishment and Application of Early Risk Stratification Method for Acute Abdominal Pain in Adults.CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL,130,(5)
MLA:
Yu Wang,et al."Establishment and Application of Early Risk Stratification Method for Acute Abdominal Pain in Adults".CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL 130..5(2017):530-535