高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Rivaroxaban Versus Dabigatran or Warfarin in Real-World Studies of Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England [2]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Guangdong Gen Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Cardiovasc Inst, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China [4]Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: atrial fibrillation dabigatran real-world data rivaroxaban warfarin

摘要:
Background and Purpose-This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-world practice compared with effectiveness and safety of dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation through meta-analyzing observational studies. Methods-Seventeen studies were included after searching in PubMed for studies reporting the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (n=3), rivaroxaban versus Warfarin (n=11), or both (n=3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Results-Overall, the risks of stroke/systematic thromboembolism with rivaroxaban were similar when compared with those with dabigatran (stroke/thromboembolism: hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.13; I-2=70.2%, N=5), but were significantly reduced when compared with those with warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.85; I-2=45.1%, N=9). Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.49; I-2=26.1%, N=5), but similar to that with warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.07; I-2=0.0%, N=6). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding, but similar risk of acute myocardial infarction and intracranial hemorrhage when compared with dabigatran. When compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban was associated with similar risk of any bleeding, mortality, and acute myocardial infarction, but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions-In this systematic review and meta-analysis, rivaroxaban was as effective as dabigatran, but was more effective than warfarin for the prevention of stroke/thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients. Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran, as was all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding. Rivaroxaban was comparable to warfarin for major bleeding, with an increased risk in gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学 2 区 外周血管病
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 临床神经病学 1 区 外周血管病
JCR分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2015版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2014版] 出版后一年[2016版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England [2]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England [4]Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark [*1]City Hospital, University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:21169 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1219 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)