Background and Purpose-This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-world practice compared with effectiveness and safety of dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation through meta-analyzing observational studies. Methods-Seventeen studies were included after searching in PubMed for studies reporting the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (n=3), rivaroxaban versus Warfarin (n=11), or both (n=3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Results-Overall, the risks of stroke/systematic thromboembolism with rivaroxaban were similar when compared with those with dabigatran (stroke/thromboembolism: hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.13; I-2=70.2%, N=5), but were significantly reduced when compared with those with warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.85; I-2=45.1%, N=9). Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.49; I-2=26.1%, N=5), but similar to that with warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.07; I-2=0.0%, N=6). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding, but similar risk of acute myocardial infarction and intracranial hemorrhage when compared with dabigatran. When compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban was associated with similar risk of any bleeding, mortality, and acute myocardial infarction, but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions-In this systematic review and meta-analysis, rivaroxaban was as effective as dabigatran, but was more effective than warfarin for the prevention of stroke/thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients. Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran, as was all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding. Rivaroxaban was comparable to warfarin for major bleeding, with an increased risk in gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.
第一作者机构:[1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England[2]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England[4]Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark[*1]City Hospital, University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Bai Ying,Deng Hai,Shantsila Alena,et al.Rivaroxaban Versus Dabigatran or Warfarin in Real-World Studies of Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].STROKE.2017,48(4):970-976.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016275.
APA:
Bai, Ying,Deng, Hai,Shantsila, Alena&Lip, Gregory Y. H..(2017).Rivaroxaban Versus Dabigatran or Warfarin in Real-World Studies of Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.STROKE,48,(4)
MLA:
Bai, Ying,et al."Rivaroxaban Versus Dabigatran or Warfarin in Real-World Studies of Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".STROKE 48..4(2017):970-976