高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Correlation Between Office-Hour and Peak Nocturnal Intraocular Pressure in Patients Treated with Prostaglandin Analogs

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Shiley Eye Institute,University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Caifornia, USA [2]Beijing Tongren Eye Center,Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the correlation between office-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) and peak nocturnal IOP is weakened after using a prostaglandin analog. DESIGN: Before-and-after study. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour IOP data obtained in a sleep laboratory of 51 patients (22 patients with open-angle glaucoma and 29 patients with ocular hypertension) were reviewed. Patients had no IOP-lowering medication upon study entry and were then treated with prostaglandin monotherapy for 4 weeks. Measurements of IOP were taken every 2 hours in the sitting and supine positions during the diurnal/wake period (7:30 AM-9:30 PM) and in the supine position during the nocturnal/sleep period (11:30 PM-5:30 AM). Individual and average IOP readings during office hours (9:30 AM-3:30 PM) and peak IOP during the nocturnal/sleep hours were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression. RESULTS: There were statistically significant correlations for all the paired variables for the analyses. Average office-hour IOP had a higher correlation with peak nocturnal IOP than individual office-hour IOP. After the treatment with prostaglandin analog, the correlation between average office-hour IOP and nocturnal peak IOP in the sitting position (r = 0.373) and the supine position (r = 0.386) were reduced from the sitting baseline (r = 0.517) and the supine baseline (r = 0.573) in right eyes. Similar change patterns appeared in left eyes. CONCLUSION: There is a correlation between office-hour IOP reading and peak nocturnal IOP under no IOP-lowering treatment as well as under prostaglandin monotherapy. The strength of correlation was weaker under the treatment compared with baseline. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 眼科学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 眼科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Shiley Eye Institute,University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Caifornia, USA [2]Beijing Tongren Eye Center,Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Shiley Eye Institute,University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Caifornia, USA [*1]Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0946, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:25477 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1499 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)