高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Peoples Eye Ctr, Xizhimen South St 11, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China [2]Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing Tongren Eye Ctr, Beijing Inst Ophthalmol, Beijing, Peoples R China [4]Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China [5]Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China [6]Allergan Plc, Irvine, CA USA
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Corticosteroid Drug delivery system Intravitreal injection Macular edema Randomized controlled trial Retinal vein occlusion

摘要:
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods This study was a six-month, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial with a 2-month open-label study extension. Patients with branch or central RVO received DEX (n = 129) or sham procedure (n = 130) in the study eye at baseline; all patients who met re-treatment criteria received DEX at month 6. Efficacy measures included Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography. Results Time to >= 15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline during the first 6 months (primary endpoint) was earlier with DEX than sham (p < 0.001). At month 2 (peak effect), the percentage of patients with >= 15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline was DEX: 35%, sham: 12%; mean BCVA change from baseline was DEX: +10.6 letters, sham: +1.7 letters; and mean CRT change from baseline was DEX: -407 mu m, sham: -62 mu m (all p < 0.001). Outcomes were better with DEX than sham in both branch and central RVO. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Increases in IOP generally were controlled with topical medication. Mean IOP normalized by month 4, and no patient required incisional glaucoma surgery. Conclusions DEX had a favorable safety profile and provided clinically significant benefit in a Chinese patient population with RVO. Visual and anatomic outcomes were improved with DEX relative to sham for 3-4 months after a single implant.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 眼科学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 眼科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2016版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2015版] 出版后一年[2017版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Peoples Eye Ctr, Xizhimen South St 11, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China [2]Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Peoples Eye Ctr, Xizhimen South St 11, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China [2]Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:23549 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1282 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)