Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study
机构:[1]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Peoples Eye Ctr, Xizhimen South St 11, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China[2]Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing, Peoples R China[3]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing Tongren Eye Ctr, Beijing Inst Ophthalmol, Beijing, Peoples R China研究所眼科研究所首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[4]Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China[5]Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China[6]Allergan Plc, Irvine, CA USA
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods This study was a six-month, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial with a 2-month open-label study extension. Patients with branch or central RVO received DEX (n = 129) or sham procedure (n = 130) in the study eye at baseline; all patients who met re-treatment criteria received DEX at month 6. Efficacy measures included Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography. Results Time to >= 15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline during the first 6 months (primary endpoint) was earlier with DEX than sham (p < 0.001). At month 2 (peak effect), the percentage of patients with >= 15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline was DEX: 35%, sham: 12%; mean BCVA change from baseline was DEX: +10.6 letters, sham: +1.7 letters; and mean CRT change from baseline was DEX: -407 mu m, sham: -62 mu m (all p < 0.001). Outcomes were better with DEX than sham in both branch and central RVO. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Increases in IOP generally were controlled with topical medication. Mean IOP normalized by month 4, and no patient required incisional glaucoma surgery. Conclusions DEX had a favorable safety profile and provided clinically significant benefit in a Chinese patient population with RVO. Visual and anatomic outcomes were improved with DEX relative to sham for 3-4 months after a single implant.
第一作者机构:[1]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Peoples Eye Ctr, Xizhimen South St 11, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China[2]Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Peoples Eye Ctr, Xizhimen South St 11, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China[2]Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Li Xiaoxin,Wang Ningli,Liang Xiaoling,et al.Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study[J].GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY.2018,256(1):59-69.doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3831-6.
APA:
Li, Xiaoxin,Wang, Ningli,Liang, Xiaoling,Xu, Gezhi,Li, Xiao-Yan...&China Ozurdex in RVO Study Group.(2018).Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study.GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY,256,(1)
MLA:
Li, Xiaoxin,et al."Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study".GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY 256..1(2018):59-69