机构:[1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Eye Ctr, Beijing Tongren Hosp, 1 Dongjiaominxiang St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[2]Beijing Ophthalmol & Visual Sci Key Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China首都医科大学附属同仁医院[3]Beijing Eye Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院研究所眼科研究所[4]Capital Med Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China[5]Aier Ophthalmol Hosp, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China[6]Hebei Eye Hosp, Hebei Key Lab Ophthalmol, Xingtai, Peoples R China[7]Handan Eye Hosp, Handan, Peoples R China[8]Univ Calif San Diego, Hamilton Glaucoma Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA[9]Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Ophthalmol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
Purpose: (1) To investigate the reference value of peak-trough difference in circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure (IOP) in habitual position and (2) to compare the IOP parameters among 3 age groups. Materials and Methods: Habitual IOP of healthy subjects sampled from the population in the Handan Eye Study was measured every 2 hours in the seated position during light-wake period (7: 30 AM, 9: 30 AM, 11: 30 AM, 1: 30 PM, 3: 30 PM, 5: 30 PM, 7: 30 PM, 9: 30 PM) and in the supine position during dark-sleep period (11: 30 PM, 1: 30 AM, 3: 30 AM, 5: 30 AM). Blood pressure and heart rate were obtained subsequently at each IOP measurement. Results: Two hundred six healthy subjects were included in the final analyses (n = 20, 30 to 39 y old; n = 95, 40 to 49 y old; n = 91, 50 to 59 y old). For peak-trough difference (7.2 +/- 2.3 mm Hg; 6.8 to 7.5 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval) in habitual position, the reference value was described as median 7.0 mm Hg, 25th percentile 5.5 mm Hg, and 95th percentile 11.5 mm Hg. No significant differences in peak-trough difference, acrophase (cosine-fit analysis derived peak timing) and amplitude (half distance between the cosine-fit maximum and minimum) were found among the 3 age groups. In the cosine model, the nocturnal acrophase (3: 49 +/- 0.53 AM; 3: 42 to 3: 55 AM, 95% confidence interval) was detected for the entire group. Furthermore, 106 subjects (52%) had a nocturnal peak pattern, 36 subjects (17%) had a diurnal peak pattern, and 64 subjects (31%) had no evident pattern. Conclusions: In habitual position, 75% of healthy subjects from a population-based investigation had IOP variation > 5.5mm Hg and 95% subjects had < 11.5 mm Hg variation. Aging may not influence the circadian habitual IOP rhythm.
基金:
Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China [201002019]
第一作者机构:[1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Eye Ctr, Beijing Tongren Hosp, 1 Dongjiaominxiang St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China[2]Beijing Ophthalmol & Visual Sci Key Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China[3]Beijing Eye Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China[4]Capital Med Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China[*1]Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Eye Ctr, Beijing Tongren Hosp, 1 Dongjiaominxiang St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China[2]Beijing Ophthalmol & Visual Sci Key Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China[3]Beijing Eye Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China[4]Capital Med Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China[*1]Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Wang Ning Li,Hao Jie,Zhen Yi,et al.A Population-based Investigation of Circadian Rhythm of Intraocular Pressure in Habitual Position Among Healthy Subjects: The Handan Eye Study[J].JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA.2016,25(7):584-589.doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000351.
APA:
Wang, Ning Li,Hao, Jie,Zhen, Yi,Liu, John H. K.,Li, Si Zhen...&Weinreb, Robert N..(2016).A Population-based Investigation of Circadian Rhythm of Intraocular Pressure in Habitual Position Among Healthy Subjects: The Handan Eye Study.JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA,25,(7)
MLA:
Wang, Ning Li,et al."A Population-based Investigation of Circadian Rhythm of Intraocular Pressure in Habitual Position Among Healthy Subjects: The Handan Eye Study".JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA 25..7(2016):584-589