高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Modified internal fixator for anterior pelvic ring fractures versus conventional two-screw fixation

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

作者:
机构: [1]复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Anterior ring Internal fixation Modified Pelvic fracture Subcutaneous

摘要:
Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate the short-term clinical effects and complications of modified three-screw fixation and conventional two-screw fixation for treating anterior pelvic ring fractures. Methods: A retrospective study of 51 patients with type B fractures was performed. 25 patients (modified group) were treated with modified three-screw fixation and the other 26 patients (conventional group) with conventional two-screw fixation. Outcome measures included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stays, postoperative complications and the Majeed score at postoperatively 2 months, 3 months, 1 year and the time of implant removal. Results: The mean operative times and mean blood loss for modified three-screw fixation versus conventional two-screw fixation bilateral were 54.8 ± 10.7 min versus 32.3 ± 9.9 min, and 153.3 mL versus 550.0 mL (p < 0.001), respectively. However, the Majeed score was better in modified group at postoperatively 2 months (75.6 ± 9.5 vs. 69.7 ± 8.3, p = 0.008) and 3 months (80.3 ± 10.7 vs. 75.1 ± 11.9, p = 0.014). There was no statistical difference between two groups at the time of implant removal (82.1 ± 9.3 vs. 80.9 ± 8.8, p = 0.272) and postoperatively 1 year (83.5 ± 7.8 vs 82.6 ± 8.2, p = 0.723). No patients experienced surgical wound infection, deep vein thrombosis, delayed union or nonunion, implant loosening or rupture. One patient complained of tardive unilateral thigh pain at postoperatively 4 months in conventional group. Conclusions: Both modified three-screw fixation and conventional two-screw fixation could ultimately afford satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with less complication for anterior pelvic ring fractures. The modified three-screw fixation might have better biomechanical strength and faster pelvic rehabilitation.

基金编号: W2017-10 ZK2012A36

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 急救医学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 急救医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:
Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院
通讯机构: [1]复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:21169 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1219 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)