高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Clinical comparison of epiretinal membrane surgery using Sharkskin forceps versus conventional forceps

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 8 South Rd Workers Stadium, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China [2]Chinese Acad Sci, Joint Lab Drug Delivery & Innovat Therapy built Be, Inst Proc Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Epiretinal membrane surgery Sharkskin forceps Conventional forceps

摘要:
Purpose To evaluate and compare the outcomes between eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for epiretinal membrane (ERM) using the Sharkskin forceps versus conventional forceps. Methods The prospective comparative study involved 38 eyes with ERM between November 2022 and May 2023. Nineteen eyes were treated with PPV and membrane peeling using the Grieshaber Sharkskin forceps, while the other 19 eyes were treated with conventional forceps. The number of grasps for initial membrane mobilization, duration for complete membrane peeling, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) before PPV and within three-month follow up, adverse events were recorded. Results All patients successfully underwent ERM removal. The Sharkskin group completed membrane removal in 198.84 s with 8.21 grasps for initial membrane mobilization, compared to 250.95 s and 10.53 grasps in the conventional group (p(1) = 0.20, p(2) = 0.15). Sharkskin forceps caused significantly fewer retinal dimples (0.58 +/- 0.69) compared to conventional forceps (1.26 +/- 0.93) (p = 0.02). Postoperative BCVA improved by 21.2% in the Sharkskin group and 29.9% in the conventional group (p(1) = 0.018, p(2) < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in BCVA improvement between the two groups (p = 0.24). Similarly, CMT decreased by 17.8% in the Sharkskin group and 14.3% in the conventional group (p(1) = 0.006, p(2) = 0.015), with no significant difference in CMT reduction between groups (p = 0.49). No other grasp-related complications or ERM recurrences were observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion The use of Sharkskin forceps in ERM surgery demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes to conventional forceps, while causing less retinal damage. These findings suggest that Sharkskin forceps can be safely and effectively utilized in vitreoretinal interface surgery.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 眼科学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 眼科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
最新[2024]版:
Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2023版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2022版] 出版后一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 8 South Rd Workers Stadium, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China [2]Chinese Acad Sci, Joint Lab Drug Delivery & Innovat Therapy built Be, Inst Proc Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 8 South Rd Workers Stadium, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China [2]Chinese Acad Sci, Joint Lab Drug Delivery & Innovat Therapy built Be, Inst Proc Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:28514 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1589 更新日期:2025-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)