机构:[1]Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院临床科室眼科白内障中心[2]Xijing Hospital, Xian, China[3]Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China[4]The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China[5]Zhengzhou Second Hospital, Zhengzhou, China[6]The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China重庆医科大学附属第一医院[7]Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, China[8]Hainan Branch of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Hospital, Hainan, China[9]Health Economic Research Institute, School of Pharmacy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact on surgical efficiency and labor time cost of preloaded intraocular lens (IOL)
implantation system compared with manual IOL implantation system in age-related cataract surgery in China.
Methods This study was an observational, multicenter, prospective time-motion analysis. IOL preparation time,
operation time, cleaning time, number and cost of cataract surgeries in eight participating hospitals were collected.
The linear mixed model was used to explore factors associated with the difference in operation time between the
preloaded IOL implantation system and the manual IOL implantation system. A time-motion model was constructed
to convert the operation time cost saved by using preloaded IOL into economic benefits from hospital and social
perspective, respectively.
Results There were 2,591 cases included in the study (preloaded IOL: 1,591 cases; manual IOL: 1,000 cases). The
preloaded IOL implantation system was significant time-saving in both preparation time and operation time
compared to the manual IOL implantation system (25.48s vs. 47.04s, P<0.001 and 353.84s vs. 367.46s, P=0.004,
respectively). An average total of 35.18s can be saved by using preloaded IOL per procedure. The results of linear
mixed model showed that the type of IOL was the main factor leading to the difference in preparation time between
preloaded IOL and manual IOL implantation system. By switching from manual IOL to preloaded IOL, the model
projected additional 392 surgeries can be performed each year and an increase in revenue of $565,282 per hospital, a
9% increase from hospital perspective. And the annual productivity loss saved by using preloaded IOL was $3,006 in
eight hospitals from perspective of society.
Conclusion Compared with manual IOL implantation system, the preloaded IOL implantation system reduces
lens preparation time and operation time, which increases potential surgical volume and revenue, and reduces the
loss of work productivity. This study provides real-world evidence to support the advantages of the preloaded IOL
implantation system in improving efficiency of ophthalmic surgery in China.
第一作者机构:[1]Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Song Xudong,Zhou Jian,Zhang Guangbin,et al.The impact of preloaded intraocular lens implantation system (TECNIS iTec®) in routine cataract surgery in China: a time-motion analysis[J].BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY.2023,23(1):126.doi:10.1186/s12886-023-02858-9.
APA:
Song Xudong,Zhou Jian,Zhang Guangbin,Jia Songbai,Yuan Jun...&Xuan Jianwei.(2023).The impact of preloaded intraocular lens implantation system (TECNIS iTec®) in routine cataract surgery in China: a time-motion analysis.BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY,23,(1)
MLA:
Song Xudong,et al."The impact of preloaded intraocular lens implantation system (TECNIS iTec®) in routine cataract surgery in China: a time-motion analysis".BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY 23..1(2023):126