机构:[1]Department of Stomatology, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院临床科室口腔科[2]Beijing Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, Beijing Municipal Education Commission and Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China.研究所耳鼻咽喉科研究所首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[3]Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.[4]Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.临床科室耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院
Subtypes of sinusitis have different symptoms and prognoses due to different pathogens. Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) mainly occurs unilaterally and is different from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) usually occurring bilaterally in terms of clinical characteristics. However, comprehensive microbiological comparisons between OMS and CRS have never been systematically conducted and most comparisons are methodologically biased. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the microbiology associated with OMS and CRS through a meta-analysis approach in order to provide evidence for differential diagnosis of OMS and CRS from a microbiological perspective.The databases PubMed and CNKI were searched from their inception to July 2023. A random-effects model was employed to derive the pooled prevalence estimates of the identified bacterial species or genera.The 17 represented studies included 6 concerning OMS, 12 concerning CRS, and 4 concerning normal sinus, yielding 191, 610, and 92 samples, respectively. Though not statistically significant, the prevalence of Peptostreptococcus and Prevotella was generally higher in OMS compared to CRS. Notably, Fusobacterium was identified as the only genus with a significantly higher prevalence in OMS compared to CRS.Fusobacterium was significantly more prevalent in OMS compared with CRS, while Staphylococcus aureus was more prevalent in CRS than in OMS. Such differences in bacterial profile may partly explain the distinct pathology observed and contribute to the development of novel strategies for diagnosis and therapeutic interventions in OMS.
基金:
This work
was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (grant
numbers 82101190, 82171110, 82000962 and 81970852,
2019-I2M-5-022); Funding of Beijing Tongren Hospital (2021-
YJJ-PY-001).
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Stomatology, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[2]Beijing Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, Beijing Municipal Education Commission and Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China.[3]Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.[4]Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Lu Chang,Zhao Yue,Qin Yicheng,et al.Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis Microbiology Compared With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis[J].American Journal Of Rhinology & Allergy.2024,38(5):324-332.doi:10.1177/19458924241259333.
APA:
Lu Chang,Zhao Yue,Qin Yicheng,Zhang Xi,Yang Xiaozhe...&Lin Jiang.(2024).Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis Microbiology Compared With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis.American Journal Of Rhinology & Allergy,38,(5)
MLA:
Lu Chang,et al."Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis Microbiology Compared With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis".American Journal Of Rhinology & Allergy 38..5(2024):324-332