高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Biomarkers in the prediction of complications in pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China [2]Mahidol Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bangkok, Thailand [3]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China [4]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Jockey Club Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China [5]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: assisted reproductive technology biomarkers early pregnancy gestational diabetes mellitus great obstetrical syndromes longitudinal changes

摘要:
Objectives To compare the temporal changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), placental growth factor (PlGF), and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) across gestation between assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies complicated with great obstetrical syndromes (GOS) or gestational diabetes (GDM) +/- large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetus, and uncomplicated ART pregnancies. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal study of 143 women with singleton pregnancies who conceived through ART at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR between December 2017 and January 2020. The participants were followed up at 6-6(+3), 11-13(+6), 20-24(+6), 30-34(+6), and 35-37(+6) weeks for the measurement of MAP, UtA-PI, PlGF, and sFlt-1. A linear mixed-effects analysis was performed to compare the biomarkers in the GOS, GDM +/- LGA, and uncomplicated groups across gestation. Results Thirty-three (23.1%) and fifty-five (31.5%) women were diagnosed with GOS and GDM +/- LGA, respectively. The GOS group had higher estimated marginal mean log(10) MAP mulitples of the median (MoM) across gestation, compared with the uncomplicated group (0.00771 vs -0.02022; P < 0.001), when adjusting for clinical visits and days of embryo transfer. The absolute mean log(10) MAP MoM in the GOS group was found to be significantly higher than that of the uncomplicated group at all clinical visits from 6 weeks onwards. Furthermore, the estimated marginal mean log(10) PlGF MoM was significantly lower in the GOS group across gestation, compared with the uncomplicated group (-0.04226 vs 0.05566; P = 0.010). The significant difference in log(10) PlGF MoM was observed from 11-13(+6) to 30-34(+6) week of gestation (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences in the estimated marginal means of log(10) UtA-PI MoM and log(10) sFlt-1 MoM between GOS and uncomplicated groups were observed. GDM +/- LGA group had a lower estimated marginal mean log(10) PlGF MoM throughout pregnancy compared with the uncomplicated group (-0.01536 vs 0.05572; P = 0.032). In the individual visit analysis, the significant difference was observed at the 20-24(+6) and 35-37(+6) weeks visits (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in estimated marginal mean log(10) MoM of MAP, UtA-PI, and sFlt-1 between GDM +/- LGA and uncomplicated groups during pregnancy. Conclusion Our study has revealed that among pregnancies conceived through ART, GOS is associated with higher MAP and lower PlGF from early gestation until late third trimester, while GDM +/- LGA is associated with lower PlGF during the second half of pregnancy. The same degree of differences in MAP and PlGF persists from early until late gestation in the GOS group and these findings highlight the importance of early screening during the first trimester to identify women who are at risk for developing GOS following ART procedures. Lastly, the potential of PlGF in predicting the development of GDM from the second trimester of pregnancy requires further investigation.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 妇产科学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 妇产科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China [5]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Hong Kong, Peoples R China [*1]Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:21173 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1219 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)