Comparing Closure Techniques for Pharyngeal Mucosa After Total Laryngectomy: Manual Suture, Linear Stapler, and Thyroid Gland Flap-A Retrospective Analysis
机构:[1]Department of General Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[2]Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.临床科室耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[3]Department of Head and Neck Surgery, BaoTou Cancer Hospital, BaoTou, Inner Mongolia, China.[4]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of manual suture (group A), linear stapler (group B), and thyroid gland flap (group C) for pharyngeal mucosal closure after total laryngectomy (TL) in laryngeal cancer patients. Methods: The data of laryngeal cancer patients who underwent TL between January 1, 2017, and December 1, 2021, were analyzed. Patients were categorized into group A, group B, and group C based on the closure technique. Various parameters, including general data, hospitalization days, total cost, pharyngeal closure time, pharyngeal fistula, pre- and post-surgical calcium levels, and thyroid function indexes, were compared. Results: The study included 81 patients (mean age: 64.09 ± 9.20 years), the general data of the 3 groups of patients were comparable. Tumor stage and primary tumor location varied significantly among the groups (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). Group A was more commonly used for advanced-stage tumors with widespread invasion. Group B was primarily used for early-stage tumors localized to the larynx. Group C was preferred for cases with mucosal defects or extensive hypopharyngeal invasion. Group B presented a significantly shorter operation time and slightly lower total cost (P = .006). Pharyngeal fistula incidence was 17.28% (14/81), with comparable rates among the groups [12.35% (10/50) in group A, 12.5% (2/16) in group B, and 13.3% (2/15) in group C]. No dysphagia complications were observed during the 2-to-5-year follow-up. Blood calcium levels and thyroid function indicators showed no significant differences before and after surgery among the 3 groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Thyroid gland flap is a safe option that can be used to repair mucosal defects and close the pharyngeal cavity after TL surgery, but in the absence of mucosal defects and widespread tumor invasion, linear staplers are the most time-efficient method.
基金:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:
This study was supported by the 2022 Inner Mongolia Health
Science and Technology Plan Project, Project No.: 202202287.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of General Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.[2]Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.[3]Department of Head and Neck Surgery, BaoTou Cancer Hospital, BaoTou, Inner Mongolia, China.
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Han Bo,Hou LiZhen,Hao Sen,et al.Comparing Closure Techniques for Pharyngeal Mucosa After Total Laryngectomy: Manual Suture, Linear Stapler, and Thyroid Gland Flap-A Retrospective Analysis[J].Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal.2024,1455613241282758.doi:10.1177/01455613241282758.
APA:
Han Bo,Hou LiZhen,Hao Sen,Han Zhengxue,Fang Jugao&Wu Jixiang.(2024).Comparing Closure Techniques for Pharyngeal Mucosa After Total Laryngectomy: Manual Suture, Linear Stapler, and Thyroid Gland Flap-A Retrospective Analysis.Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal,,
MLA:
Han Bo,et al."Comparing Closure Techniques for Pharyngeal Mucosa After Total Laryngectomy: Manual Suture, Linear Stapler, and Thyroid Gland Flap-A Retrospective Analysis".Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal .(2024):1455613241282758