高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of CAR T-cell and bispecific antibody as third-line or later-line treatments for multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China [2]Capital Med Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Peking Univ Sixth Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China [4]Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Hematol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China [5]Southern Med Univ, Shunde Hosp, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: bispecific T cell engager - BiTE chimeric antigen receptor - CAR hematologic malignancies multiple myeloma

摘要:
Background CAR-T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody have revolutionized the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma. However, there is currently a lack of studies comparing the efficacy and safety of these two approaches. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T-cell therapies and BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibodies as third-line or later interventions for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to May 31, 2024, identifying 11 eligible studies encompassing 1269 participants. Random-effects models evaluated the primary (complete response (CR) rate) and secondary (overall response rate (ORR)) outcomes, while meta-regression analyses adjusted for relevant covariates. Results CAR-T-cell therapy achieved significantly higher pooled CR rate (0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.69) vs bispecific antibodies 0.35 (0.30-0.41), p<0.01) and pooled ORR (0.83 (0.76-0.90) vs 0.65 (0.59-0.71), p<0.01). However, CAR-T therapy had a higher incidence of adverse events, particularly cytokine release syndrome (CRS 0.83 (0.70-0.97) vs bispecific antibodies 0.59 (0.43-0.74), p<0.05). Severe CRS (grade >= 3) occurred at a rate of 0.07 (0.03-0.14) in the CAR-T cell group, contrasting with a negligible rate of 0.01 (0.00-0.02) in the bispecific antibody group (p<0.01). Hematologic adverse events, including neutropenia (grade >= 3; 0.88 (0.81-0.95) vs 0.48 (0.30-0.67), p<0.01) and anemia (grade >= 3; 0.55 (0.47-0.62) vs 0.34 (0.28 to 0.40), p<0.01), were also more frequent in the CAR-T-cell group. Furthermore, differences in efficacy were observed among various CAR-T products, with ciltacabtagene autoleucel showing greater efficacy in CR rate (0.77 (0.71-0.84) vs 0.37 (0.32-0.41), p<0.01) and ORR (0.91 (0.83-0.99) vs 0.73 (0.68-0.77), p<0.01) compared with idecabtagene vicleucel. Conclusion CAR-T-cell therapy demonstrated superior CR rates compared with bispecific antibodies, although with an increase in severe adverse events.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 免疫学 2 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 免疫学 2 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Q1 ONCOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Q1 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China [2]Capital Med Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:25491 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1499 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)