Comparison of swept-source and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in quantitative characterisation of the optic nerve head
机构:[1]Department of Ophthalmology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China[2]Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA[3]Boston Keratoprosthesis Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA[4]Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Aims To compare swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain OCT (EDI-OCT) in quantitative assessment of optic nerve head (ONH) parameters. Methods In a cross-sectional study, patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and age-matched control subjects underwent SS-OCT and EDI-OCT B-scans of the ONH in a single visit. Two masked readers independently measured the horizontal and vertical lamina cribrosa depth (LCDH and LCDV, respectively), as well as thinnest Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) from SS-OCT and EDI-OCT scans. We assessed agreement between SS-OCT and EDI-OCT measurements by linear regression models, Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results One eye from each of 40 patients with POAG and 20 controls were included. All three ONH measurements were higher on SS-OCT than on EDI-OCT, with significant differences in LCDH (mean difference=31.7 mu m, p<0.01) and thinnest BMO-MRW (mean difference=20.5 mu m, p<0.01). Linear regression models described the agreement between SS-OCT and EDI-OCT measurements with R-2>0.8 for LCDH among both patients with POAG and controls and for thinnest BMO-MRW among patients with POAG. The CCC was >0.8 overall for each parameter. Intrareader and inter-reader ICCs were 0.989 and 0.964, respectively, for all parameters. Conclusions LCDH, LCDV and thinnest BMO-MRW measurements are not interchangeable between SS-OCT and EDI-OCT, but show good intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility and interdevice agreement for quantitative characterisation of the ONH, particularly among patients with glaucoma.
基金:
Harvard Glaucoma Center of Excellence; Miller Research Funds at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; Harvard Medical School Distinguished Scholar Award; Eleanor and Miles Shore Fellowship, Harvard Medical School
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Ophthalmology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China[2]Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[2]Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA[*1]Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Li Dejiao,Taniguchi Elise V.,Cai Sophie,et al.Comparison of swept-source and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in quantitative characterisation of the optic nerve head[J].BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY.2017,101(3):299-304.doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308586.
APA:
Li, Dejiao,Taniguchi, Elise V.,Cai, Sophie,Paschalis, Eleftherios I.,Wang, Haobing...&Shen, Lucy Q..(2017).Comparison of swept-source and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in quantitative characterisation of the optic nerve head.BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY,101,(3)
MLA:
Li, Dejiao,et al."Comparison of swept-source and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in quantitative characterisation of the optic nerve head".BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 101..3(2017):299-304