Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly managed with rhythm control strategy, but the natural history of this common arrhythmia leads itself to progression from paroxysmal to persistent or permanent AF, and recurrences are evident despite rhythm control treatments using cardioversion or catheter ablation. Numerous clinical factors have been associated with outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with AF. The more common factors have been used to formulate risk stratification scores, to help predict the outcomes of rhythm control treatments or AF progression. This review article provides an overview on the published clinical risk scores related to outcomes of rhythm control strategy or AF progression.
第一作者机构:[1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England[2]Guangdong Gen Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Cardiovasc Inst, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Univ Birmingham, City Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England[5]Univ Belgrade, Sch Med, Belgrade, Serbia[7]Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Deng Hai,Bai Ying,Shantsila Alena,et al.Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review[J].CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY.2017,106(10):813-823.doi:10.1007/s00392-017-1123-0.
APA:
Deng, Hai,Bai, Ying,Shantsila, Alena,Fauchier, Laurent,Potpara, Tatjana S.&Lip, Gregory Y. H..(2017).Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY,106,(10)
MLA:
Deng, Hai,et al."Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review".CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY 106..10(2017):813-823