高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Cochlear implants for patients with inner ear malformation: Experience in a cohort of 877 surgeries

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: cochlear implant inner ear malformation clinical experience

摘要:
Objective To analyse clinical information from a cohort of 877 cochlear implant (CI) surgeries performed in patients with inner ear malformations and report our experience with this procedure. Methods Clinical information on patients with inner ear malformation who underwent CI surgery in our department from January 2010 to April 2017 was analysed. Results Seven hundred and fifty-four CI surgeries (86.0%) were uneventful but cerebrospinal fluid gusher occurred during surgery in 118 cases (13.5%). Not including the patients lost to follow-up, postoperative Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores were collected from 13 patients with common cavity deformity, 38 with IP-I, 11 with hypoplasia, 13 with IP-III, 285 with IP-II and 43 with cochlear nerve deficiency. The mean CAP scores were 2.55, 3.39, 3.45, 3.77, 3.98, 2.95 and 2.90, and the mean SIR scores were 1.54, 3.68, 3.72, 3.54, 3.80, 2.31 and 2.32. Patients with common cavity deformity who underwent surgery using the traditional facial recess approach or transmastoid slotted labyrinthotomy approach had significantly better post-activation scores on the CAP, SIR and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale/Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, with no significant differences between the two approaches. Conclusion The traditional facial recess approach can be successful, and several approaches may be used for electrode insertion and gusher control in patients with a severe deformity, particularly common cavity deformity and IP-III. A gusher was the most common intraoperative finding and occurred most often in patients with IP-III. Careful consideration of the type of electrode used is important.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 耳鼻喉科学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 耳鼻喉科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [*1]Department of Otolaryngology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:23595 今日访问量:3 总访问量:1285 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)