机构:[1]Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China临床科室变态反应科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[2]Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China临床科室耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[3]Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China研究所耳鼻咽喉科研究所首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院
Background Methods Although nasal congestion is among the most common symptoms in subjects suffering from nasal diseases, relatively few data on normal airflow resistance are available for reference, especially in healthy Chinese subjects. The aim of present study was therefore to objectively measure the normal airflow resistance by rhinomanometry, and calculate mean and standard reference intervals in a cohort of healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 1084 participants were recruited in Huairou region in Beijing, China from November to December 2011. All participants were required to complete 2 questionnaires and undergo nasal examination and objective assessment of nasal resistance by rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry. Results Conclusion A total of 704 adults completed both questionnaires and nasal examinations; with 505 (71.73%) subjects considered "healthy" based on negative medical history, absence of nasal symptoms, and normal findings by nasal examination. The mean total nasal resistance in the congested nose was 0.168 Pa/cm(3)/sec (95% CI, 0.068 to 0.268 Pa/cm(3)/sec) at 75 Pa pressure and 0.243 Pa/cm(3)/sec (95% CI, 0.112 to 0.374 Pa/cm(3)/sec) at 150 Pa pressure. The mean total nasal resistance in males was significantly lower compared to females at 75 Pa and 150 Pa (p < 0.001). The mean unilateral nasal resistance was 0.357 Pa/cm(3)/sec (95% CI, 0.034 to 0.680 Pa/cm(3)/sec) at 75 Pa and 0.511 Pa/cm(3)/sec (95% CI, 0.086 to 0.936 Pa/cm(3)/sec) at 150 Pa, with no significant difference between males and females. Application of a vasoconstrictor decreased both total and unilateral nasal resistance, which was significant at 75 Pa. These reference values maybe useful for the Chinese clinicians in evaluating the nasal function and in choosing and assessing efficacy of therapy for nasal congestion in Chinese patients.
基金:
Funding sources for the study: National Key R&D Program of China
(2016YFC20160905200); National Natural Science Foundation of China
(81570895, 81420108009, 81400444, 81470678, and 81630023); Changjiang
Scholars and Innovative Research Team (IRT13082); Special Fund of Capital
Health Development (2011-1017-06,2011-1017-02); Special Fund of
Sanitation Elite Reconstruction of Beijing (2009-2-007); Beijing Health
Bureau Program for High Level Talents (2011-3-043); Beijing Municipal
Administration of Hospitals’ Mission Plan (SML20150203); Capital Citizenry
Health Program (z161100000116062); Beijing Advanced Innovation Center
for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business
University (20181045).
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China[2]Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China[3]Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China[*1]Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, No. 17, HouGouHuTong, DongCheng District, Beijing, 100005, P.R. China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Ren Lei,Zhang Luo,Duan Su,et al.Nasal airflow resistance measured by rhinomanometry in a healthy population of China[J].INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY.2018,8(11):1308-1314.doi:10.1002/alr.22177.
APA:
Ren, Lei,Zhang, Luo,Duan, Su,Zhang, Wei&Zhang, Yuan.(2018).Nasal airflow resistance measured by rhinomanometry in a healthy population of China.INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY,8,(11)
MLA:
Ren, Lei,et al."Nasal airflow resistance measured by rhinomanometry in a healthy population of China".INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY 8..11(2018):1308-1314