Efficacy and safety of linagliptin added to metformin and sulphonylurea in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of data from a randomised clinical trial
机构:[1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[2]Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[3]Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China四川大学华西医院[4]Qingdao Univ, Coll Med, Affiliated Hosp, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China[5]Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co KG, Shanghai, Peoples R China[6]Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Ingelheim, Germany
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of linagliptin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled by metformin and sulphonylurea. Research design and methods: Data for a pre-defined Chinese subgroup who participated in a Phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, 24 week trial (NCT00602472) were analysed. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks. Apart from safety endpoints, secondary endpoints included changes in FPG and measures of insulin secretion and resistance. Results: A total of 192 Chinese patients with T2DM participated in the pre-defined analysis; 144 and 48 patients received linagliptin or placebo, respectively, added to metformin and sulphonylurea. Baseline characteristics (mean [+/- SD]) for linagliptin and placebo were similar: HbA1c: 8.1% (+/- 0.85) and 8.1% (+/- 0.84); body mass index: 25.9 (+/- 3.2) and 25.6 (+/- 3.4) kg/m(2), respectively. Placebo-corrected mean (+/- SE) change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks was -0.68% (0.14) with linagliptin-based treatment (95% CI: -0.96 to -0.39; P<0.0001). Placebo-corrected mean (+/- SE) change in FPG from baseline at 24 weeks with linagliptin was -18.8 (6.5) mg/dL (-1.0 [0.4] mmol/L; 95% CI: -31.7 to -5.9; P = 0.0044). Overall adverse event (AE) rates with linagliptin and placebo including background medication were similar (38.9% and 43.8%, respectively). Drug-related AEs were reported by 12.5% and 2.1% of linagliptin and placebo patients, respectively. Differences were due to hypoglycaemia (10.4% and 0.0%, respectively). No severe hypoglycaemia was reported in either group of this sub-population. Conclusion: Linagliptin in combination with metformin and sulphonylurea has a favourable safety profile and is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment option for Chinese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM. Reduction of sulphonylurea dose should be considered to minimise risk of hypoglycaemia. Although the findings of this pre-specified sub-analysis may be limited by the number of patients in the subgroup, the results were generally consistent with those for the overall population.
基金:
Boehringer Ingelheim
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2012]版:
大类|3 区医学
小类|3 区医学:内科3 区医学:研究与实验
最新[2023]版:
大类|4 区医学
小类|3 区医学:内科4 区医学:研究与实验
JCR分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
Q1MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALQ2MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALQ3MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
第一作者机构:[1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[6]Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Ingelheim, Germany[*1]Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Therapeut Area Metab, Binger Str 173, D-55216 Ingelheim, Germany
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zeng Zhengpei,Yang Jin-Kui,Tong Nanwei,et al.Efficacy and safety of linagliptin added to metformin and sulphonylurea in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of data from a randomised clinical trial[J].CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION.2013,29(8):921-929.doi:10.1185/03007995.2013.805123.
APA:
Zeng, Zhengpei,Yang, Jin-Kui,Tong, Nanwei,Yan, Shengli,Zhang, Xiling...&Woerle, Hans-Juergen.(2013).Efficacy and safety of linagliptin added to metformin and sulphonylurea in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of data from a randomised clinical trial.CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION,29,(8)
MLA:
Zeng, Zhengpei,et al."Efficacy and safety of linagliptin added to metformin and sulphonylurea in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of data from a randomised clinical trial".CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION 29..8(2013):921-929