高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Central Corneal Thickness and Glaucoma in Adult Chinese The Beijing Eye Study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing Inst Ophthalmol, Beijing 100005, Peoples R China [2]Univ Heidelberg, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Ophthalmol, Heidelberg, Germany
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: central corneal thickness intraocular pressure tonometry glaucoma

摘要:
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether glaucoma was related to central corneal thickness (CCT). Methods: The Beijing Eye Study 2006 is a population-based study that included 3251 (73.3%) Subjects (aged 45+y) Out Of the 44)9 subjects who had participated in the Survey in 2001, and who returned for a reexamination. The main outcome measures were central corneal thickness and presence and progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Results: Measurements of CCT were available for 3100 (95.4%) subjects. CCTs did not vary significantly (P > 0.10) between the "optic disk glaucoma" [n = 78 (2.5%) subjects 551 +/- 32 mu m], the "perimetric glaucoma" [n = 38 (1.1%) subjects: 550 31 pin]. and the normal groups (n = 3022; 556 +/- 33 mu m). The CCT was not significantly associated with the neuroretinal rim area (P = 0.28) or the mean visual-field defect (measured by frequency-doubling perimetry) (P = 0.22). 111 multiple regression analysis. the CCT was significantly associated with male sex. (P < 0.001). urban region (P < 0.001), and intraocular pressure measurements (P < 0.001); whereas it was not significantly (P = 0.17) associated with chronic open-angle glaucoma. During follow-ups from 2001 to 2006, 42 Subjects, who showed a progression of, or development of glaucomatous abnormalities of the optic nerve head did not differ significantly (P = 0.30) in CCTs from the stable group. Conclusions: CCTs might not be markedly different between glaucomatous and normal eyes. The reasons for the discrepancies between the present population-based study and previous hospital-based investigations might be due to the differences in study design and mode of selection of study participants.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2007]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 眼科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2006]版:
Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2006版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2005版] 出版后一年[2007版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing Inst Ophthalmol, Beijing 100005, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing Inst Ophthalmol, Beijing 100005, Peoples R China [2]Univ Heidelberg, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Ophthalmol, Heidelberg, Germany [*1]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing Inst Ophthalmol, 17 Hougou St, Beijing 100005, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:23425 今日访问量:5 总访问量:1281 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市东城区东交民巷1号(100730)