Comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis and linear measurement for predicting the survival of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0-and A stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation
机构:[1]Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[2]Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.医技科室超声诊断科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院
The prognostic role of the tumor volume in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0 and A stages remains unclear. This study aims to compare the volumetric measurement with linear measurement in early HCC burden profile and clarify the optimal cut-off value of the tumor volume.The consecutive patients diagnosed with HCC who underwent initial and curative-intent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were included retrospectively. The segmentation was performed semi-automatically, and enhanced tumor volume (ETV) as well as total tumor volume (TTV) were obtained. The patients were categorized into high- and low-tumor burden groups according to various cutoff values derived from commonly used diameter values, X-tile software, and decision-tree analysis. The inter- and intra-reviewer agreements were measured using the intra-class correlation coefficient. Univariate and multivariate time-to-event Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors of overall survival.A total of 73 patients with 81 lesions were analyzed in the whole cohort with a median follow-up of 31.0 (interquartile range: 16.0 - 36.3). In tumor segmentation, excellent consistency was observed in intra- and inter-reviewer assessments. There was a strong correlation between diameter-derived spherical volume and ETV as well as ETV and TTV. As opposed to all linear candidates and 4,188 (mm3) (sphere equivalent to 2 cm in diameter), ETV >14,137 mm3 (sphere equivalent to 3 cm in diameter) or 23,000 mm3 (sphere equivalent to 3.5 cm in diameter) was identified as an independent risk factor of survival. Considering the value of hazard ratio and convenience to use, when ETV was at 23,000 mm3, it was regarded as the optimal volumetric cut-off value in differentiating survival risk.The volumetric measurement outperforms linear measurement on tumor burden evaluation for survival stratification in patients at BCLC 0 and A stages HCC after RFA.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Yang Siwei,Zhang Zhiyuan,Su Tianhao,et al.Comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis and linear measurement for predicting the survival of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0-and A stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation[J].DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY.2023,29(3):450-459.doi:10.4274/dir.2023.222055.
APA:
Yang Siwei,Zhang Zhiyuan,Su Tianhao,Chen Qiyang,Wang Haochen&Jin Long.(2023).Comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis and linear measurement for predicting the survival of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0-and A stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY,29,(3)
MLA:
Yang Siwei,et al."Comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis and linear measurement for predicting the survival of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0-and A stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation".DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 29..3(2023):450-459