The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children
机构:[1]School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, The Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,[2]College of Optometry, Midwestern University, Glendale,[3]Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, USA,[4]School of Environmental Science & Public Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou,[5]Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[6]Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
PurposeTo investigate the difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with the progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children. MethodsA total of 386 children aged 6-17 years were enrolled in the baseline investigation of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study in 2010. They were invited for follow-up vision examinations in the years 2011, 2012, and 2013, including cycloplegic (cyclopentolate 1%, three times) autorefraction. We investigated the difference between the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) and the non-cycloplegic SE (DSE) provided by autorefraction and its association with refractive error progression. The progression of refractive error was defined as the difference between the cycloplegic SE at follow-up and at baseline. ResultsTwo hundred and nineteen children (57%) with completed refractive data (mean standard deviation: -1.36 +/- 2.44 D at baseline) were ultimately enrolled. The DSE reduced from 0.51 +/- 0.72 D at baseline to 0.19 +/- 0.43 D in the third year of follow-up (p = 0.01). The baseline DSE was positively associated with the children's baseline cycloplegic refraction ( = 0.193 dioptre dioptre(-1), p < 0.001). After further divided by refractive status, the DSE was consistently higher in the hyperopic group than in either the emmetropic or myopic groups at each follow-up (all p < 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, the myopic children with larger baseline DSE ( = -0.404 dioptre dioptre(-1), p = 0.01) exhibited more myopic refractive change. However, baseline DSE was not found to be a significant risk factor (relative risk, 95% confidence interval: 1.06, 0.79-1.41) for those with newly developed myopia. ConclusionIn this sample, the children's DSE was found to be increased as the hyperopic refraction increased. Furthermore, greater the DSE was associated with the progression of refractive error among the myopic children, but not with the onset of myopia.
基金:
Research Startup Project
for doctors of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical
University (KYQD131101), the Wenzhou Medical University
Research Fund (QTJ13009), and the Beijing Science &
Technology Novel Star Program (2009B44).
第一作者机构:[1]School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, The Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, The Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,[6]Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Lin Zhong,Vasudevan Balamurali,Ciuffreda Kenneth J.,et al.The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children[J].OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS.2017,37(4):489-497.doi:10.1111/opo.12381.
APA:
Lin, Zhong,Vasudevan, Balamurali,Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.,Zhou, Hong Jia,Mao, Guang Yun...&Liang, Yuan Bo.(2017).The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS,37,(4)
MLA:
Lin, Zhong,et al."The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children".OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS 37..4(2017):489-497