机构：[1]Humanitas San Pio X Hospital, Milan, Italy,[2]Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany,[3]Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China,[4]Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China,[5]Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院首都医科大学附属同仁医院[6]EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China,[7]BAI JI Ophthalmology, Chongqing, China,[8]Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China,[9]Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China,[10]Shenyang Aier Eye Hospital, Shenyang, China,[11]Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy,[12]IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between Caucasian and Chinese healthy subjects with regards to Corvis ST dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs). MethodsTwo thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine healthy Caucasian and Chinese subjects were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Subsequently, Chinese eyes were matched to Caucasians by age, intraocular pressure (IOP), and Corneal Thickness (CCT) using a case-control matching algorithm. The DCRs assessed were Deformation Amplitude (DA) Applanation 1 velocity (A1v), integrated radius (1/R), deformation amplitude ratio (DAratio), stiffness parameter at applanation 1 (SPA1), ARTh (Ambrosio's Relational Thickness to the horizontal profile), and the novel Stress Strain Index (SSI). ResultsAfter age-, CCT-, and IOP- matching, 503 Chinese were assigned to 452 Caucasians participants. Statistical analysis showed a statistical significant difference between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy subjects in the values of SPA1 (p = 0.008), Arth (p = 0.008), and SSI (p < 0.001). Conversely, DA, A1v, DAratio, and 1/R were not significantly different between the two ethnical groups (p > 0.05). ConclusionWe found significant differences in the values of the DCRs provided by the Corvis ST between Chinese and Caucasian healthy subjects.
第一作者机构：[1]Humanitas San Pio X Hospital, Milan, Italy,
通讯作者：
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714)：
Vinciguerra Riccardo,Herber Robert,Wang Yan,et al.Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects[J].FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE.2022,9:doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.834663.
APA：
Vinciguerra, Riccardo,Herber, Robert,Wang, Yan,Zhang, Fengju,Zhou, Xingtao...&Vinciguerra, Paolo.(2022).Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects.FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE,9,
MLA：
Vinciguerra, Riccardo,et al."Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects".FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE 9.(2022)
